{"id":32,"date":"2026-06-19T13:33:31","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T11:33:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/?page_id=32"},"modified":"2026-06-24T09:43:52","modified_gmt":"2026-06-24T07:43:52","slug":"research-projects-a-b-c","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/research-projects-a-b-c\/","title":{"rendered":"Research projects (A, B, C)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Narrating History (A)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This cluster examines how the past is constructed and made meaningful through narrative. A01 (Conermann\/Bonn) edits and analyzes Mehmed Giray&#8217;s Crimean Tatar and Ottoman chronicle (1683\u20131703), probing its narrative strategies and forms of historical sense-making. A02 (Friede\/Bochum) develops the category of &#8222;narrative constellations&#8220; to analyze the Old French prose Lancelot-Grail cycle. A03 (Krause\/Bochum) applies a diachronic narratological approach to prophetic books of the Hebrew Bible (Amos, Ezekiel). A04 (Morenz\/Bonn) studies how two major societal crises in Pharaonic Egypt generated new historiographic styles. A05 (Setzer-Mori\/Bochum) investigates history-telling under censorship in early modern Japan&#8217;s commercial book market. A06 (Tilg\/Freiburg) traces the origins and functions of the 17th-century roman-\u00e0-clef from John Barclay&#8217;s Latin novels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/narrating-history-a\/\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"37\">More information<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Narrating Ideas (B)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This cluster explores how concepts and arguments are turned into narrative. B01 (Baumbach\/Bochum) studies &#8222;first inventors&#8220; in ancient literature as self-reflexive figures of poetic creation. B02 (Bezner\/Freiburg) develops a poetics of integumental narrative in 12th-century Latin literature, where philosophical concepts act as characters. B03 (Gunsenheimer\/Bonn) examines how indigenous authors in colonial Spanish America adopted the European concept of &#8222;nation.&#8220; B04 (M\u00fcller\/Bonn) theorizes narrative within ancient philosophical dialogue (Plato, Cicero). B05 (R\u00fcggemeier\/Bonn) reassesses the &#8222;Holy Spirit&#8220; as an off-stage character in Mark&#8217;s Gospel through cognitive narratology. B06 (Schwermann\/Bochum) analyzes allegories and exempla as arguments of governance in classical Chinese treatises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/narrating-ideas\/\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"39\">More information<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" style=\"margin-top:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50);margin-bottom:var(--wp--preset--spacing--50)\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Narrating Life (C)<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This cluster focuses on character and the representation of lives. C01 (Br\u00fcggen\/Bonn) studies the art of character depiction in Wolfram von Eschenbach&#8217;s Parzival. C02 (von Contzen\/Freiburg) develops a movement-oriented theory of character in Chaucer&#8217;s Canterbury Tales. C03 (Eggert\/Bochum) examines narrativity in Korean funerary orations (chemun) of the 16th\u201318th centuries. C04 (Kollatz\/Heidelberg) studies biographical compendia of the Mamluk period and their narration of careers and dependencies. C05 (Rein\u00f6hl\/Freiburg) investigates repetition in the endangered Eastern Himalayan oral tradition Igu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/narrating-life-c\/\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"41\">More information<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Narrating History (A) This cluster examines how the past is constructed and made meaningful through narrative. A01 (Conermann\/Bonn) edits and analyzes Mehmed Giray&#8217;s Crimean Tatar&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_customify_content_layout":"","_customify_sidebar":"","_customify_page_header_display":"","_customify_disable_header":"","_customify_disable_header_top":"","_customify_disable_header_main":"","_customify_disable_header_bottom":"","_customify_disable_page_title":"","_customify_disable_content_vertical_padding":"","_customify_disable_footer_top":"","_customify_disable_footer_main":"","_customify_disable_footer_bottom":"","_customify_breadcrumb_display":"","_customify_header_transparent_display":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-32","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":129,"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/32\/revisions\/129"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/narratology.de\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}